 This week, the European Central Bank made its first back-to-back interest rate reduction in more than a decade, reducing its key rate by 25 basis points in an effort to support the eurozone’s weakening economy.
The bank lowered the main deposit rate to 3.25 per cent from 3.5 per cent in the third cut this year reducing the cost of borrowing from a record high of 4 per cent. The move came after a range of data reinforced concerns that the EU's major economies are struggling. Germany, is projected to expand by just 0.1 per cent this year, according to the OECD. The Eurozone economy as a whole is expected to grow by 0.7 per cent. “Manufacturing and exports are weak. Firms are not investing much. Services have been doing a bit better, thanks to a good summer tourism season. Even though many people have more money to spend, they are preferring to put it aside, even more so than before the pandemic.” The ECB said. “”The saving rate stood at 15.7 per cent in the second quarter, well above the pre-pandemic average of 12.9 per cent.” Inflation across the twenty nations fell to 1.7 per cent in September from 2.2 per cent the previous month, below the ECB’s target. Wage pressures, often singled out as a source of inflationary concern, have also cooled more quickly than expected. In a statement announcing the latest rate reduction, the governing council stated: “The incoming information on inflation shows that the disinflationary process is well on track.” “We're breaking the neck of inflation,” Christine Lagarde said in the Slovenian capital of Ljubljana as she announced that the European Central Bank was cutting interest rates. “It’s not broken completely yet, but we’re getting there.” Markets now see a high chance of rates being lowered by a further 25 basis points in December. The ECB is leading the way in comparison with the Fed and the Bank of England. The Euro is paying the price.
0 Comments
 Last Sunday, it will have been 100 days since Keir Starmer became prime minister to form the first Labour government in over 14 years. While still only a fraction of the way through this parliament, it has been an eventful few months and a period that has taken its toll on Labour's popularity.
After just three months in power, six in ten Britons (59%) disapprove of the government's record so far, with only one in six approving (18%). Keir Starmer's popularity has sunk, with 63% of Britons seeing him unfavourably, just over a quarter (27%) still holding a positive view. Three in ten Britons (30%) say they had expected Labour to do well in government, but have been left disappointed by what they have seen so far. For a further 37% of Britons Labour's poor performance is what they were expecting in the first place. Only one in eight (12%) say their positive expectations have been met. Labour Had A Plan ... Labour had a plan for their early days of government, carefully worked on for months by Sue Gray, Starmer's then chief of staff. But despite that, it has been far from easy. Starmer insists he expected that. "It has proved the thesis that government is tougher, but also that government is better, because you get to take decisions." Preparations for government had been put in the hands of Gray and a small team of party officials, working at a secretive office around the corner from Labour's HQ in Southwark. Visitors were discouraged. "We were told Sue had a plan, and to keep our noses out of it," says one campaign adviser. "But she clearly didn't." One view is that some of Downing Street's early problems could have been avoided if they had spun a clearer narrative around all the activity. "There was no big set of announcements to capture that spirit of change," says an insider. There was no confirmation of a "Master Grid" and too much "gloom and doom" at onset. Others might argue like Mike Tyson, "Everybody has a plan until you get punched in the face." Big decisions, new legislation, foreign trips and attempts to set the political narrative, were established but the blows to the face kept on coming. Not just over donations, of clothing, sunglasses and sofas but stories of internal rows at No 10, the backlash to the cuts to the winter fuel payment and the lack of a clear strategy to reduce child poverty. Labour's first king's speech initially went off without a hitch, bringing in bills to nationalise the railways, establish Great British Energy, the National Wealth Fund, improve workers' rights and change planning rules to build more houses. Ministers scrapped the Tories' Rwanda scheme, got rid of the Bibby Stockholm Barge and set up a border security command to tackle small-boat crossings. They invited Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Downing Street, and took first steps to reset relations with the EU. They reached pay deals with junior doctors and train drivers, and funded above-inflation public sector wage rises, helping to reverse years of service disruption adn decline. Just two weeks into office, Starmer faced his first major test, a Commons rebellion calling for the two-child benefit cap to be scrapped. Inside No 10, it was seen as an early and not entirely unhelpful opportunity to flex muscles, with Labour backbenchers, particularly on the left. Outside, though, it filled many MPs, including some in the cabinet, with dismay. "If we're not tackling child poverty, what are we doing?" one said at the time. Seven rebels, including veteran left winger John McDonnell, were stripped of the whip for six months. The government announced a child poverty task force but it did little to stem despair across the party, and the wider public, over such a symbolic issue. The Black Hole Within days of becoming chancellor, Reeves announced the Treasury would be carrying out an audit of the fiscal inheritance, one of the worst since the second world war. The Chancellor claimed to have found a £22 billion black hole in government spending plans for essential public services in 2024-25. The Government immediately leapt on the deficit as evidence of irresponsible management of the economy, requiring tax increases and spending cuts in the budget to meet the shortfall. To help fill the black hole, the biggest mistake was made, cutting the winter fuel payment for pensioners. It was an expensive move politically, to generate a modest contribution financially. More to fill a a pothole than a cosmic hole, the abolition of the winter fuel allowance will contribute just £1.5 billion. It could well be less. Reeves has been bullish, in private and in public, about the decision, arguing that she had no choice. Otherwise the axe would have fallen on support for disabled people or families with children. "There's no way I'm doing that"" she is said to have told angry MPs. The Morton's fork, it's a tricky bit of sophistry in which a conclusion is drawn in several different ways that contradict each other. MPs were not forked. Internal frustrations within Starmer's top team, which had been kept at bay by the election, began to bubble over, with. Gray increasingly became the "overpaid" lightning rod. Some political colleagues accused her of "control freakery", creating a "bottleneck" in No 10 that had delayed policy decisions and appointments. Finally, after warnings from senior aides and cabinet ministers to "get a grip", Starmer came to the conclusion that some of the side winds blowing could develop into a hurricane. Gray was getting the blame for many of the missteps. It had become unsustainable. At the end of the week, Starmer summoned her to a meeting, at which he told her that she would have to go. Calmer Waters ... Morgan McSweeney, the political mastermind behind the party's win, was appointed chief-of-staff in her place, supported by two deputies and a new director of strategic communications. There are now hopes of calmer waters. 'I want to make Downing Street boring again," McSweeney is said to have told officials. Clearly Starmer needs a cool head of strategy, a master grid, an attack dog (Thatcher's Tebbit) and a great budget at the end of the month. The Treasury has been market testing options, like a mad man in a Woolworths pick and mix shop. Employment tax, higher capital gains tax, a raid on pensions, what else? Business are wary, holding back on plans for investment and recruitment. The last millionaire to leave the country has been asked to leave a suitable donation at customs. Bring on the budget, let's have a clear plan. But don't hinder the growth objective in the process ...  "Has Animal Farm Moved Into Downing Street ?" ...
We are into the final decile of the Labour Government's first one hundred days. It feels as if we are into the final chapter of Animal Farm. By chapter ten in George Orwell's brilliant political satire, the pigs are walking on two legs, talking with the humans, drinking and playing cards with the former enemy, as the other unfortunate animals are urged to work harder and eat less. The mantra "four legs good, two legs bad, four legs bad", has morphed into "four legs good, two legs better". The windmill investment providing cheap energy for all, has been annexed by the pigs to power the grinding mill, processing grain for the coffers of the elite. The milk and barley has been hogged by the pigs. The pig swill has been distributed to all in the fields, with demonstrative largesse. "Has Animal Farm Moved into Downing Street? In opposition, Sir Keir Starmer repeatedly accused the last Conservative government of cronyism, from its handling of contracts for personal protective equipment during the pandemic to renovations of the flat in Downing Street. But just two months into government, the Labour prime minister and some of his most senior colleagues have been accused of failing to declare freebies including clothing and a trip abroad in the most transparent way. For Rosie Duffield, it is all a bit too much. The Labour MP for Canterbury has quit the party over the freebies scandal, accusing Sir Keir Starmer of presiding over "sleaze, nepotism and apparent avarice that is off the scale." Resigning her position, the MP for Canterbury, told Sir Keir that she was "ashamed of what he and his inner circle had done to tarnish and humiliate our once proud party". She declared that he was unfit for office after "inexplicably" choosing to accept designer suits and sun glasses while at the same time pursuing "cruel and unnecessary" policies. In her resignation letter to the Prime Minister, Ms Duffield said: "Someone with far above average wealth choosing to keep the Conservatives' two-child limit to benefit payments which entrenches children in poverty, while inexplicably accepting expensive personal gifts of designer suits and glasses costing more than most of these people can grasp, is entirely undeserving of holding the title of Labour prime minister." "Forcing a vote on the winter fuel payment to make many older people iller and colder while you and your favourite colleagues enjoy free family trips to events most people would have to save hard for and you not showing even the slightest bit of embarrassment?" Rosie Duffield has become the fastest MP to jump ship after a general election in modern political history. It came after Sir Keir admitted on Friday that Lord Alli gave him £32,000 to pay for clothing, double what he previously declared. Sir Keir also received £2,400 from Lord Alli for glasses, and the use of an £18 million penthouse during the election campaign and on other occasions. Members of his front bench team have also declared large donations from the peer. Why are gifts to Starmer in the spotlight? According to the Financial Times, Starmer accepted £76,000 worth of entertainment, clothes and similar freebies from UK donors in the last parliament, more than any other MP. The most generous benefit disclosed was £16,200 of "work clothing" and £2,485 of spectacles from Lord Waheed Alli, a Labour peer and former chair of online clothing retailer Asos. The row intensified this month when it was reported that Starmer's wife, Victoria, had received £5,000 of clothing from Alli that had not been initially declared in the register of MPs interests. Starmer fully declared that he had taken £20,437 of "accommodation" from Alli during the election campaign, which he has since said was used by his son for the period of his GCSE exams. [The stay was from May 29 until July 13 but the GCSE season had ended by June 19, raising questions over how necessary the accommodation was.] Starmer has promised to take no more clothing but he will retain the use of a box provided by Arsenal football club, which he says he needs for security reasons to continue taking his son to matches. Liz Bates Political Correspondent for Sky writes,"The public were expecting to see one of their own in Number 10, but Labour ministers' "early life" struggles are now a distant memory for them. It appears that whatever they want is at their fingertips and they are making the most of it. During the election campaign, Sir Keir made a virtue of his ordinariness and this has continued into government. He sold the public the dream of a prime minister, not from Eton and Oxbridge, but a pebble-dashed semi, the son of a toolmaker, who was one of them. In his conference speech he did it again, referencing "people of a completely ordinary working-class background like mine". But now Starmer and his ministers are living a life of privilege, free clothes, free sunglasses, free tickets, parties paid for, the use of million-pound properties whenever they need them. They may have started off trying to make ends meet, but now whatever they want is at their fingertips and they are making the most of it. Voters, promised one of their own in Number 10, see someone whose life could not be further from theirs and it's jarring. The rules weren't broken here but the public's impressions aren't just based whether particular guidelines were followed or not. Some will think Animal Farm has moved into Downing Street. All animals are equal but some are more equal than others. Labour principles good, Tory lifestyles better. References This week's post relies on extracts from our daily "What the Papers Say Review." Certain research and photo content has also been generated using Perplexity AI. This is our favorite AI research tool. Photos are from The Adobe Stock, The Saturday Economist Slide Deck and DALL-E Starmer freebies row is not about corruption - it's about class. Liz Bates Sky News. Labour MP quits over "freebies" scandal and Keir Starmer's "cruel policies". Camilla Turner, Telegraph. Why Is Kier Starmer Under Pressure Over freebies ... Jim Pickard and Anna Gross in London and Lucy Fisher in New York, Financial Times. Animal Farm Orwell's Brilliant Political Satire. George Orwell  Liz Truss goes for a full house in her buzzword bingo says Tom Peck writing in The Times this week .. Members queued round the block at the Tory conference for the former PM’s bulletproof epistemology: that she was definitely right and everybody else was wrong. The huge queues are the vindication she requires. She was prime minister for six weeks, her party lost 200 seats, but the number of people who still want to listen to her are proof that she was definitely right about everything. It was all the world’s fault, not hers. The event was a Q&A hosted by the Telegraph’s sketch writer, Tim Stanley. “I’m going to plough straight in,” he said. “Is Britain now on the road to socialism?” "Socialism is bad. We’re not just on the road to it. We are already in it,” said Truss. She smiled nervously. Her blow-dried hair fluttered under the stage lights and she launched straight in to her greatest hits. Nothing was her fault. It was all the establishment, all the deep state. Labour shows itself to be “unserious” when it dares to blame the failure of the mini-budget on her and not on the Bank of England and the Office for Budget Responsibility (who she banned from looking at it). She also claimed that the election would have gone better if she’d still been in charge. “The problem, she explained, was “the neo-Marxist orthodoxies of wokery”. That’s verbatim, almost a full house of Liz Truss bingo in just six words. The Q&A finished, she made her way out of the room, past a bank of reporters from every conceivable broadcaster and podcaster, waiting to doorstep her. None of them were gifted a word. Within seconds she was out the door and gone. https://lnkd.in/eXCPeKbm  Junior doctors had been offered a 22.3% pay rise to end strike action. Train drivers have been offered a 15% settlement, teachers and nurses have been offered a 5.5% settlement. Such spending on public sector pay will not easily be absorbed into more restrictive fiscal targets from The Chancellor..
In 1948, Aneurin Bevin was asked how he had achieved an accommodation with doctors in the creation of the National Health Service. He explained he did it by “stuffing their mouths with gold”. A generous pay award and the right to treat private patients as a sideline helped. Starmer and Reeves appear to be using the same technique to resolve conflict in the public sector. “Stuffing Their Mouths With Gold’, with generous pay awards. More savings on spending, or higher taxes will have to be found to pay for the awards. Even the triple alliance of the big three taxes may be at risk at the onset of the new Labour Five year term. Only a quarter of voters believe that Labour’s public sector pay deals are affordable, according to recent polling for The Times. YouGov polling suggests only a third of voters think the party has handled the problem well. Almost 40 per cent of those questioned said the government had handled the issue badly, including 15 per cent of those who supported the party at last month’s election. A quarter of voters said they thought the deals would make future strikes more likely, while a third said Labour was too close to the trade union movement. Only 22 per cent said that the party had got the balance right. The government is preparing to publish its long-awaited workers’ rights package when parliament returns next month amid concerns from business leaders that it will strengthen the hand of the unions and raise costs for companies. The Federation of Small Businesses has warned confidence among small business owners fell back into negative territory in the second quarter of the year, largely due to higher private sector wages. The Trades Union Congress (TUC) is expected to press Labour for “pay restoration”, to make up for a decade of public sector real-terms salary cuts, when it holds its annual conference next month. Economists estimate that each one percentage point rise in the public sector pay bill would cost taxpayers about £2.5 billion. To restore public sector pay to the 2011 level in real terms would theoretically require a 21 per cent increase, of more than £50 billion. The survey found that despite worries about the cost, a majority of people were in favour of ministers agreeing pay deals to end the strikes. Just over 40 per cent said the 14 per cent three-year pay deal for train drivers was the right thing to do, while 38 per cent insisted it was wrong. The 22 per cent deal offered to junior doctors was backed by 57 per cent of voters but opposed by 27 per cent. The Tories had budgeted for an increase of just 2% in public sector pay deals. The imposition of a pay cut in real terms was never really realistic. The hidden costs of low pay deals are huge. They include, strike action and disruption. Increased waiting lists in the NHS, low grades in schools and increased waiting times on platforms. Low pay results in low morale, high staff turnover, increased recruitment difficulties, high training costs and huge on boarding challenges. Stuffing their mouths with gold may appear to be an expensive solution. Stuffing their mouths with “suckanhock and wampum”, makes low pay deals too difficult to swallow leading to a greater increase in cost. References ... Suckanhock a dark-coloured kind of shell -money, Wampum a traditional shell bead. Only a quarter of voters believe Labour pay deals are affordable … The Times Rising Costs Sap Confidence of Small Business ... The Times  “There is a budget coming in October and it will be painful” , Starmer warns in a Downing Street speech this week …
This could mean the Autumn budget could be not so much a Happy Halloween event, but more a Horror Halloween event. More Tricks than Treats in prospect from the new Chancellor of the Exchequer. Rachel Reeves has already warned of difficult decisions and the need for tax rises in the October budget. The borrowing figures for July continued to be “above forecast” increasing the probability of tough decisions ahead. Borrowing in the first four months of 2024-25 totalled £51.4 billion. This is just £0.5 billion below the same period last year and £4.7 billion above the monthly profile consistent with the latest OBR forecasts. The OBR explains, the difference with the forecast profile in the July data, is driven by higher spending by government departments, as a result of strong growth in public sector pay. Receipts are broadly in line with profile in the year to date the OBR said. It looks as if the OBR forecasts for the year of £80 billion will be exceeded significantly. The running rate (year on year basis) suggests borrowing this year will be around £120 billion. The consensus forecasts for borrowing PSNB basis this year is around £106.4 billion well ahead of the OBR outlook in March of £80 billion. The Chancellor has strongly hinted there will be tax rises in the autumn budget as she promised to be "honest" about "difficult" decisions that lie ahead. The public had been "misled for too long" about the state of the country's finances. "There will be more difficult decisions" around spending, welfare and tax, she added, when asked whether people should be prepared for taxes to be increased in the autumn. Watch My Lips No Increase in Major Taxes … During the election campaign, Ms Reeves promised not to increase major taxes on national insurance, income tax and VAT. But there was speculation that Labour could target other taxes, including capital gains tax, inheritance tax and employers national insurance charges. No increase in the levels of income tax allowances would mean the “fiscal drag” bonus would continue. The Tory cut in National Insurance charges may be reviewed following the assessment by the Prime Minister ‘Things are worse than we ever imagined. Speaking at a press conference shortly after announcing a series of spending cuts to make up part of a £22 billion funding shortfall, the Chancellor said … "The truth is we did not know about the £22 billion black hole this year when we went to the polls on 4th July. There will be more difficult decisions around spending, around welfare and around tax at the budget and the spending review later this year.” The chancellor announced a series of spending cuts, including cuts to the winter fuel allowance, which will now only go to those in receipt of pension credit. More cuts are expected in the budget along with the tax rises. More tricks, fewer treats in the Horror Halloween event. It’s going to be a cliff hanger … let’s hope it doesn’t damage the growth ambitions too much moving forward.  Britain’s economy received an upgrade from Wall Street this month. Official data showed another quarter of growth in the second quarter. Growth in Q2 was up by 0.9% year on year, following growth of 0.3% in the first quarter, according to official figures from the ONS, the Office For National Statistics.
Service sector performance pushed the economy higher, despite sluggish growth in manufacturing and a setback in construction. Bank of America raised its forecast for UK Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2024 from 0.8% to 1.1%. Optimism was also evident in the latest edition of Forecasts For The UK Economy published by HMT in August. The average forecast for growth this year increased to 1.1% from 0.9% prior month. Forecasts for growth in 2025 increased to 1.25%. The Bank of England was even more optimistic in the Monetary Report this month. Growth is expected to be 1.25% this year, easing to 1.0% next. Perhaps the Bank is more concerned about the autumn budget than others, but more on that later. For the moment, the growth estimate of 1.1% is fair value. This will require a significant improvement in the performance of the economy in the second half of the year. The latest Flash UK PMI Composite Output Index at 53.4 this month up from 52.8 in July, is supportive of the growth upgrade but it won’t be easy. The latest data in general was a case of the good, the bad and the ugly. Growth figures were good, inflation data casting a note of caution. The borrowing figures were challenging, causing deep concern amongst Treasury watchers ...  Starmer's About to Inherit An Economic Boom ... Or Is He?
The Labour leader is beginning his premiership, with the best economic backdrop in years, according to Szu Ping Chan, writing in The Telegraph on Thursday. The article appeared following the release, by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), of the GDP monthly estimate, UK for May 2024. The U.K economy grew at double the pace predicted by economists in the month, in a boost for Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves. The economy expanded by 0.4pc on a month on month basis. This is the fastest pace in more than two years and double the 0.2pc expected by analysts, according to the Office for National Statistics. Better still, compared to previous year, (our favourite measure), the economy grew by 1.4%. The strong performance prompted economists at Goldman Sachs to upgrade their own growth forecasts. James Moberly, economist at Goldman, said: "We raise our annual GDP growth forecast for 2024 to 1.2pc. This is above consensus of 0.7pc and the Bank's forecast of 0.4pc." Barclays and Deutsche Bank also raised forecasts to 1.1% and 1.2% for growth this year, following the latest data. At The Saturday Economist, we are flagging a change in our expectations for the year. Assuming no growth month on month for the rest of the year, growth in 2024 will be around 1.2%, (last year's performance was so bad). We await a further month's data for June and the second quarter of 2024 to confirm the call. Forecasts for the year could be revised even higher if the growth spurt continues. Grant Fitzner, the ONS's chief economist, described the expansion as "buoyant", (but not gangbusters) adding other indicators of the economy suggested the recovery was gaining traction. Britain's services sector was the largest contributor to growth, with the sector expanding by 1.6 per cent year on year. Transport and distribution was up by over 7 per cent, professional services sector was up by over 4 per cent. Liz McKeown, director of economic statistics at the ONS, said: "Construction grew at its fastest rate in almost a year after recent weakness, with house building and infrastructure projects boosting the industry." Growth in professional services was also a bright spot for the economy both in May and since the start of the year. The ONS said May's growth was driven by a rise in "scientific research and development" as well as technical testing and analysis linked to the engineering sector." Mr Fitzner said: "It continues a reasonably buoyant trend that we've seen through the first half of this year. Some of that is a bounce back from the downturn from last year, but this is continuing into the second quarter." The Pound rallied closing at just under $1.30 on Friday. Markets appear confused by mixed messages from the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England for that matter. The TSE chart suggests this is an over extension in the short term, some short positions should be restored at the start of next week. We expect the Sterling rally to fade somewhat. Ten year gilt yields moved down slightly closing at 4.11 from 4.12. Two year gilts closed off five basis points in the week. It may not be a boom, but higher growth will ensure additional monies into the Rachel Reeves coffers, allaying fears of tax hikes, perhaps ...  It's a Labour Landslide ... with just 34% of the vote ...
John Authers, senior editor for markets at Bloomberg summed it up, "I wouldn't vote for Labour, one of my favorite contacts in the City told me this week, but they aren't going to mess things up." This is the attitude permeating the UK's financial community. The mood for months has been the Conservatives deserved to lose power. It doesn't matter much, if Labour do win. They could hardly do much worse than the Tories Now the voters have spoken, taking the same attitude as the City perhaps. Casting ballots tactically, against the Tories. Labour's share of the vote didn't rise much but ... In the final count, Labour gained 211 seats, leading with 412 seats overall. The Conservatives lost 250 seats, entering the House next week, with just 120 seats. Lib Dems the big gainers with 63 new MPs and 71 seats in the lower chamber. Reform the big no show with just five seats at close of play. It must have been Ed Davey's bungee jumping which tipped the poll for the Lib Dems. Perhaps Nigel Farage, should have been at the end of a bungee rope. Many would have voted for that. In terms of share of votes, Labour scored 34%, Tories 24%, Reform 14% and the Lib Dems 12%. Interesting to note the combined Tory-Reform share was 38%, a four point lead over Labour. Lib Dems lower share of the vote, yielding many more seats that Reform. No wonder Reform advocate a first past the pub system. For the Tories, it was the end of an era. Many big names lost in the battle. Liz Truss, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Penny Mordaunt, Grant Shapps (Defence Secretary), Gillian Keegan, (Education Secretary) and Lucy Frazer (Culture Secretary. Jeremy Hunt clung on to his Surrey seat. The ex Chancellor, MP for South West Surrey since 2005, won the newly created seat of Godalming and Ash by around 1,000 votes after stiff competition from the Liberal Democrat candidate. Will he be the next leader of the Tory Party? Rishi Sunak has announced he will step down, once formal arrangements are in place to elect his successor. Sunak held 48% of the vote in the constituency of Richmond and Northallerton in Northern England. A staunch Tory seat, "they would elect a goat, if it had a blue rosette around its neck", it is said. For the Tories and the electorate, it has all been too much. Since 2016 there have been five prime ministers, seven chancellors, seven foreign secretaries, seven home secretaries, eight industry ministers and nine education secretaries. In 2022 alone, the country experienced three prime ministers, four chancellors of the exchequer, three home secretaries, three health secretaries, three industry ministers and five education secretaries. Since the implosion of the gilts market in 2022, it has been taken as inevitable the Conservatives would lose out in the election. The terrifying episode of rising rates, would ensure Labour would not attempt a big expansion of tax and spending plans in a dash for growth. Labour will take over, accepting the bond market won't let them do anything too expansionary or ambitious. Whatever Labour does next, it will be within the parameters set by the gilts market. That's why the City is so relaxed. So How Did The Markets React ? UK stock markets moved higher following news of Labour's election victory. House builders the biggest winners. Traders bet the new government's proposals to free up the planning system would allow developers to build more homes. Excitement curtailed, the FTSE closed at just under 8,200, down from the peak of 8,269 intra day. Ten year gilt yields closed at 4.13% drifting slightly over the day. Sterling closed up against the Dollar at $1.28 and up against the Euro at 1.08. The limited reaction in currency and bond markets reflected the fact the election result has been a foregone conclusion for a long time now. Starmer and Reeves have made it pretty clear they would play safe for now. The new Prime Minister stated in his speech. "Our work is urgent .. We begin it today". A lot to be done, we wish them well ... But The Bond Vigilantes Are Watching ...  The UK economy grew at a faster rate in the first quarter of the year, according to the latest update from the Office of National Statistics. Rishi Sunak hailed the growth figures as the "fastest growth in the G7." Growth is even better than "gangbusters", the excitable claim from Grant Fitzner, chief economist at the ONS, when the first estimate of GDP growth was announced in May. "The next Prime Minister is likely to inherit an improved economy" according to Jane Croft and Larry Elliott in the Guardian.
But will the economic revision be enough to save Sunak? I doubt that. Just four days before polling day, the Tories still trail Labour by 20 points in the polls but more of that later. First let's get the growth revision into perspective. GDP growth rose by 0.3% year on year according to the GDP Quarterly National Accounts released on Friday. The first estimate released on the 10th May, marked growth year on year at 0.2%. An improvement OK but not by much. Headlines react to the ONS statement which leads with growth rate quarter on quarter. At the end of the day, (make that the end of the year), it is the growth rate year on year which counts. Year on year, the performance was mixed. Manufacturing was up by 1.7%. Construction was down by 0.4%. Service sector growth was up by 0.4%. The transport and Storage sector was down 0.8%. Accommodation and Food, was down by over 1%. Don't break out the bunting just yet. Yes, the next prime Minister will inherit an improving economy. Growth could be as high as 0.5% in the second quarter. On track for growth of between 0.5% and 1.0% this year. It may well be Rachel Reeves that is the real winner. But the economy will need to grow at a much faster rate to allay fears over spending and borrowing Will It Save Sunak ... Just four days before polling day, the Tories still trail Labour by almost 20 points. The latest YouGuv survey has Labour on 36%, the Tories on 18%, just ahead of Reform at 17%. The Farage rally has fizzled out. Statements on Putin and Ukraine add the odd hint of racism and right wing extremism in the mix. Not for everyone, the economics of the tap room from a platform of the bar stool. In terms of seats, Labour could pick up over 220 seats in the house, with 425 MPs in the final count. The Conservatives would be left with just 108 seats, leaving Lib Dems with 50 plus and Reform with just five MPS. That's a big win for Starmer and a massive set back for the Tories. A growth rate of 0.3% is not enough to save Sunak ... That's all for now. Have a great weekend break ... Watch out for our update on the US election, the first debate described in the Telegraph, "not so much a debate more a medical emergency". Don't miss that! |
The Saturday EconomistAuthorJohn Ashcroft publishes the Saturday Economist. Join the mailing list for updates on the UK and World Economy. Archives
January 2025
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed
